DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post

**QEoMi752** · 08-24-2012, 11:04 PM

In order for you not to lose and get a lot more serious sentence, especially if the evidence is not in your favour. In this particular case he is getting the most serious sentence he can get, and not even fighting the last round, let alone appealing.

Not that I care that much as there should be no winner for those years, Ulrich was also doping, just less effectively and it is a fairly safe bet that there is no success in cycling without some sort of extra stimulation these days, but to pretend Lance did not "cheat" is silly.

08-24-2012, 11:04 PM	#16
QEoMi752 Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 458 Senior Member	In order for you not to lose and get a lot more serious sentence, especially if the evidence is not in your favour. In this particular case he is getting the most serious sentence he can get, and not even fighting the last round, let alone appealing. Not that I care that much as there should be no winner for those years, Ulrich was also doping, just less effectively and it is a fairly safe bet that there is no success in cycling without some sort of extra stimulation these days, but to pretend Lance did not "cheat" is silly.
	Quote