[wiweimeli]

It's a stupid ignorant thing to do by the local RC overthere. And eventhough the RCC is doing a lot of stupid things lately it's still a bit silly to claim that the entire RCC is therefore stupid and silly. There may be other reasons, but that's not one of them.

I have heard a lot of ignorant wannabe atheists lately claim that the god particle showed that there was no god, b/c there was now a god-particle instead.
Anyway, the RCC really needs some major organizational structuring. Unfortunately it'll never allow that. The RCC doctrine is a rope around it's own neck. Only if they will reject some old church teachings (which are now sacred, and will therefore never change!) the church can't change and will therefore not survive.

Protestant churches do not have this problem b/c every church is local in protestantism. If a church doesn't evolve with time (which is a christian thing to do!) then the local church will just be replaced by another one.

The basic problem is just that humans are mainly conversative.
People don't like it to have their way of life and thinking change.
In the hypotethical situation where neo-Darwinism would be proven wrong by scientists and replaced by a new scientific theory, even then large majorities of todays scholars and scientist will reject that and Darwinism will live long after the scientific death of it. That's how we humans work and think. Only a few prefer change over stability. (and thanks to those few we are where we are today!)

But never make this silly mistake to think that 'you' are smarter or more enlightened b/c you follow a 'post modern' teaching while others follow a more dated teaching. You're just lucky for now. The real question is: will you be able to adopt or change if humanity progresses beyond your system?