DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post

**HedgeYourBets** · 05-29-2006, 07:00 AM

Dear thiru nsomu,

Tamil is grown language even before 2000 years back.

It is better to follow the grammar to make similarities among different dialects in tamil nadu.

Any amendment in grammar can be made if necessity arises and that too authentical way ( a group of tamil veterans can decide and update the grammar) to accomodate tamil words newly invented that does not match with the grammar.

This was followed in sangam period. The 'nannul' grammar was written by nandi munivar during A.D.470 to accomodate north indian words(they are all shrinked tamil words only). Note nandi munivar's mother tongue is kannada.

After that nowhere in history grammar was changed. Perhaps all kings never bother about tamil during that time.

In my opinion grammatical poetry will long live than artificially created work like 'pudukavithai'.

Logos should also follow grammar. Because it appeals directly to people.

05-29-2006, 07:00 AM	#13
HedgeYourBets Join Date Aug 2008 Posts 4,655 Senior Member	Dear thiru nsomu, Tamil is grown language even before 2000 years back. It is better to follow the grammar to make similarities among different dialects in tamil nadu. Any amendment in grammar can be made if necessity arises and that too authentical way ( a group of tamil veterans can decide and update the grammar) to accomodate tamil words newly invented that does not match with the grammar. This was followed in sangam period. The 'nannul' grammar was written by nandi munivar during A.D.470 to accomodate north indian words(they are all shrinked tamil words only). Note nandi munivar's mother tongue is kannada. After that nowhere in history grammar was changed. Perhaps all kings never bother about tamil during that time. In my opinion grammatical poetry will long live than artificially created work like 'pudukavithai'. Logos should also follow grammar. Because it appeals directly to people.
	Quote