View Single Post
Old 05-21-2012, 05:44 PM   #18
Aminkaoo

Join Date
Nov 2005
Posts
464
Senior Member
Default
Btw, properly measured the people who were the top 0.1% or maybe even 1% in income in 2007 should have had negative income in 2008.
For one (two) year, yes. And obviously for that year they would pay no taxes (if we decide to tax based on income, as I said, I think it makes more sense to tax based on consumption/wealth due to difficulty in accounting).

But if we go on the ~30 year average it is very high.

JM
Aminkaoo is offline


 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:50 PM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity