View Single Post
Old 05-18-2009, 03:00 PM   #10
PhillipHer

Join Date
Jun 2008
Age
59
Posts
4,481
Senior Member
Default
I do doubt that, News Guy. I don't think the Democratic Party and Obama want Iran to have nuclear weapons, just that they are too wimpy to do anything about it. Of course, just to be fair and balanced, Bush and co. weren't able to do anything about Iran's nuclear program either.

Half measures and the ineffective response to Iran's nuclear program are making a devastating war inevitable. Millions will die as a result.
Of course Obama is too wimpy to do anything about anything, except create a huge domestic deficit and raise taxes on hard-working Americans. Obama is not about effective foreign policy, he's just about paying off his underclass voters with other people's money.

But unfortunately, Obama is our president, so we do hold him accountable for Iran getting nuclear weapons, because he's decided to stand by idly as North Korea and Russia supply Iran with nuclear capabilities even while Iran is threatening to wipe Israel off the map.

Obama is telling Iran publicly that he's extending his hand in peace and that he wants talks with Iran for an unlimited amount of time without preconditions. That's understood by the whole world as a delay tactic to give Iran more time to solidify its nuclear weapons program, courtesy of the Obama administration.
PhillipHer is offline


 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:23 AM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity