DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post

**Peptobismol** · 01-11-2006, 01:03 AM

Parsi,

Please understand that there is no animosity towards the Persian people or the nation of Iran on the part of Israel. There is great concern about the present leadership.

You have a Mullahcracy that has talked about Israel being a "one bomb" country, who spreads zionist conspiracy myths, who admits to arming Hezbollah, whose president talks about the coming of the 12th Imam and essentially armagedon, and has widened streets for his coming, and who has repeatedly talked about the destruction of Israel. And they are in defiance of UN resolutions on their nuclear programs - they could have peaceful nuclear energy with no problems with the Russian compromise, etc. - which has been rejected.

Now, you might be right, it might be just talk or cover on the part of the Mullahs and Ahmadinejad. But Israel can't afford to be wrong.

I don't advocate attacking Iran's nuclear sites, they are too interspersed in the population and too hidden and fortified. It would take open war, and cause numerous causalties. No one wants that.

Covert action (sabotage) against oil facilites, on the other hand, would merely create intense economic pressure. Money would have to be redirected from hezbollah and the nuclear program to the people of Iran, which is where that oil money should be going, anyways. There would be strong pressure on Iran to accept the US/EU offer on enrichment, which would give Iran the peaceful nuclear energy it has the right to have.

Because, Parsi, if you are wrong, and Iran tests a nuclear bomb, it could be nuclear war right then and there.

01-11-2006, 01:03 AM	#4
Peptobismol Join Date Oct 2005 Age 58 Posts 4,386 Senior Member	Parsi, Please understand that there is no animosity towards the Persian people or the nation of Iran on the part of Israel. There is great concern about the present leadership. You have a Mullahcracy that has talked about Israel being a "one bomb" country, who spreads zionist conspiracy myths, who admits to arming Hezbollah, whose president talks about the coming of the 12th Imam and essentially armagedon, and has widened streets for his coming, and who has repeatedly talked about the destruction of Israel. And they are in defiance of UN resolutions on their nuclear programs - they could have peaceful nuclear energy with no problems with the Russian compromise, etc. - which has been rejected. Now, you might be right, it might be just talk or cover on the part of the Mullahs and Ahmadinejad. But Israel can't afford to be wrong. I don't advocate attacking Iran's nuclear sites, they are too interspersed in the population and too hidden and fortified. It would take open war, and cause numerous causalties. No one wants that. Covert action (sabotage) against oil facilites, on the other hand, would merely create intense economic pressure. Money would have to be redirected from hezbollah and the nuclear program to the people of Iran, which is where that oil money should be going, anyways. There would be strong pressure on Iran to accept the US/EU offer on enrichment, which would give Iran the peaceful nuclear energy it has the right to have. Because, Parsi, if you are wrong, and Iran tests a nuclear bomb, it could be nuclear war right then and there.
	Quote