Thread
:
Some background on the new NSC chief
View Single Post
04-12-2008, 09:18 PM
#
1
Ifroham4
Join Date
Apr 2007
Posts
5,196
Senior Member
Some background on the new NSC chief
Obama Chooses Chevron Jones
Yesterday, President-elect Barak Obama chose General James L. Jones to be his National Security Adviser.
General Jones is a highly decorated American soldier who seems to feel that Israel must be pressured into an agreement with the Palestinians.
In a recent interview with Inside the Pentagon, General Jones said that "nothing is more important" for Middle East than settling the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.
He also authored a report that criticized Israel's security tactics in the West Bank and recommended using NATO forces to secure the area.
General Jones serves on the Board of the Chevron Corporation. Chevron has close business ties with Saudi Arabia. Perhaps this helps explain his aggressive stance toward Israel and his kid gloves approach to the Palestinians.
Mere Rhetoric
has more on Jones.
It should concern friends of Israel that a man with Jones's views will be at the right hand of President Obama.
http://www.onejerusalem.org/2008/12/...vron-jones.php
http://www.mererhetoric.com/archives/11275103.html
Well
that
was
totally unpredictable
wasn't it?
General James L. Jones is widely rumored to be Obama's preferred candidate to be
White House National Security Adviser...
Jones prepared a report on Israel's policies in the territories... The World Tribune said it "blasted Israel's role" for "hampering the movement of PA forces, blocking plans for weapons shipments and technology to the Palestinians and resisting coordination." ... Obama said this about Jones: "Let me tell you who I associate with... If I'm interested in figuring out my foreign policy, I associate myself with my running mate, Joe Biden or with Dick Lugar...or General Jim Jones, the former supreme allied commander of NATO."Totally, totally
unpredictable:
John Brennan... is rumored to be
Obama's pick to head the CIA.
Brennan published a long article on Iran in July 2008... "... U.S. national security would be best served if Washington publicly acknowledged and explored the roots of this shift in Iranian state support for terrorist activities ... the new U.S. administration must be willing to exercise strategic patience....It would not be foolhardy, however, for the United States to tolerate, and even to encourage, greater assimilation of Hezbollah into Lebanon's political system.The US should exercise "strategic patience" with Iran - who as of today has
four navy bases
in the Gulf, is
building up
its conventional arsenal, and is at most
two years away
from a nuke - plus support Hezbollah's takeover of the Lebanese government. All because Iran is
becoming more moderate.
This is definitely a guy with his finger on the pulse of geopolitical dynamics.
Now a little background on Jones's current posting: he was sent to the Middle Eats last year at Rice's behest to
pressure Israel into making concessions.
Israel has made
some of those concessions
even though State's trusted Palestinian moderates are still
threatening to launch wars.
Not enough for Jones: he's currently at work
creating a paper trail
that blames Israel for Middle East violence and outlines a vision of a Palestinian state:
US Middle East security coordinator James L. Jones, long expected to produce a document spelling out Israel's security needs after the creation of a Palestinian state, will not in the end present the Bush administration with a large-scale report... "There is not going to be any Jones report that lays out the whole strategic vision of what a post-agreement reality would look like," one US official said. "There is not going to be one consolidated report." Rather than codifying America's conception of Israel's security needs into one document that would then be a guidepost for US Middle East policy, Jones is instead relaying his impressions to ... Rice through memos and briefings, diplomatic sources said... Diplomatic sources said that Jones's role, never clearly defined, had
evolved over the year,
and that he had gone from concentrating on looking at regional security issues after a Palestinian state was established, to
helping prepare the ground for a Palestinian state.
An anti-Israel State Department bait and switch:
how original.
I like the nice touch of having him produce a pile of findings, precedents, and opinions rather than just a single inaccurate report that might be shelved like the
politicized NIE
about Iranian nuclearization. A neat little example of how the drip drip drip erosion of Israel's security requirements plays out in practice.
That
willfully inaccurate NIE report,
incidentally? Supported by Brennan as proof of Iranian moderation. Obviously.
Quote
Ifroham4
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by Ifroham4
All times are GMT +1. The time now is
01:58 PM
.