[TorryJens]

Click here to read the original quotes in context.

http://jeffreygoldberg.theatlantic.c..._and_hamas.php

[I]When I visited Ramallah, among a group of Palestinian students, one of the things that I said to those students was: “Look, I am sympathetic to you and the need for you guys to have a country that can function, but understand this: if you’re waiting for America to distance itself from Israel, you are delusional. Because my commitment, our commitment, to Israel’s security is non-negotiable.”

That's a lie.

Obama has repeatedly stated that he will force Israel to expel Jewish families from the land of Israel to give that Jewish land to Palestinian terrorists -- just like was done in Gaza. And, we can see how well that turned out for Israel's security.

You want an end to Jewish settlement in the Land of Israel? Obama's your man. That's why terrorist groups like Hamas and racist, anti-Semitic groups like Nation of Islam suppport Obama. If they believed that he would actually fight terrorism, they would never support him. But they're correct. Hussein Obama is the best choice for Muslim terror groups, that's for sure.

So I welcome the Muslim world’s accurate perception that I am interested in opening up dialogue and interested in moving away from the unilateral policies of George Bush, but nobody should mistake that for a softer stance when it comes to terrorism or when it comes to protecting Israel’s security or making sure that the alliance is strong and firm. You will not see, under my presidency, any slackening in commitment to Israel’s security. Another major lie from Obama.

Which exactly are the "unilateral policies" of George Bush that Obama would be "moving away" from? Let's get specific. I would be interested in knowing what the Bush policies are currently, and what the Obama policies would be if elected, God forbid.