DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post

**BegeMoT** · 02-12-2012, 02:14 AM

Not very significant. If rap really has the enormous "aesthetic value" you claim it has then someone was going to introduce it to the world sooner or later, right? And the "song" (if you can call it a song) sucks.

I don't understand what your second sentence means.

What is the definition of 'song' to you and how does Rapper's Delight not fit that definition? I'm struggling to see what basis can someone have that that is not a 'song'.

02-12-2012, 02:14 AM	#15
BegeMoT Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 491 Senior Member	Not very significant. If rap really has the enormous "aesthetic value" you claim it has then someone was going to introduce it to the world sooner or later, right? And the "song" (if you can call it a song) sucks. I don't understand what your second sentence means. What is the definition of 'song' to you and how does Rapper's Delight not fit that definition? I'm struggling to see what basis can someone have that that is not a 'song'.
	Quote