DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post

**PhillipHer** · 02-09-2006, 07:00 AM

It could be reasoned either way. Bush is the known entity and he doesn't have any credibility with most of the public and the world therefore it would be difficult to start any new adventures. Kerry would, metophorically speaking, have a new line of credit. Some governments and some terrorist governments think that new line of credit would allow Kerry to mettle in their affairs, and pressure them to stop a lot of human rights abuses (like Darfur, Iran, Turkey) and the other group, who see Bush as the best choice think that he is best because he is not going to pressure them on that avenue so the only thing he would do is start a new war...which is not likely. That's the only explaination I can come up with.

Basically, it's just a really, really weird year!

02-09-2006, 07:00 AM	#1
PhillipHer Join Date Jun 2008 Age 59 Posts 4,481 Senior Member	It could be reasoned either way. Bush is the known entity and he doesn't have any credibility with most of the public and the world therefore it would be difficult to start any new adventures. Kerry would, metophorically speaking, have a new line of credit. Some governments and some terrorist governments think that new line of credit would allow Kerry to mettle in their affairs, and pressure them to stop a lot of human rights abuses (like Darfur, Iran, Turkey) and the other group, who see Bush as the best choice think that he is best because he is not going to pressure them on that avenue so the only thing he would do is start a new war...which is not likely. That's the only explaination I can come up with. Basically, it's just a really, really weird year!
	Quote