View Single Post
Old 05-15-2012, 07:13 PM   #98
theonsushv

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
574
Senior Member
Default
I don't have a massive problem engineering wise from the layout. I agree that for some scenarios that configuration makes sense.

In terms of precession. Doesn't really come I to it. What it isn't like is the movie starship enterprise. It doesn't zip I to orbit and go from warp 9 to orbit in no time at all. Starting and stopping the rotating section would be done over a long time period. You don't really make aggressive turns in space. The trajectory is for the most part a section of an elongated solar orbit.

Ion engines make sense in terms of energy source. If you use nuclear what you have is electrical energy. The other option would be a nuclear drive, but we don't really have one yet so may void the idea of using current tech"

Really the problem is money rather than technology. I am sure a ship that can travel as fast as this one, and is as big as this o e would end up looking quite different to this concept. However that is not really the issue. The issue is money.
Nice post Martin...
Of course the issue is money!
That's the reason why I differ from BTE Dan, and would make it an International effort....
.
theonsushv is offline


 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:31 PM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity