DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post

**Kristoferson** · 03-03-2009, 06:42 AM

I suspect that the ad was accepted because the magazine makes prime dollars on outside back cover ads. It was not an endorsement of the ad. What is sad, is that the values of the ad are contrary to the Church's values. If it is a struggling magazine, my guess is that it was a difficult decision to print the ad, but the pragmatics of economics forced the decision.

Part of me wishes that was the story here, Allen, but in this case, the ad is actually for the Ant. Archdiocese Convention...this is their ad inviting (wealthy) people to the annual convention!

03-03-2009, 06:42 AM	#6
Kristoferson Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 522 Senior Member	I suspect that the ad was accepted because the magazine makes prime dollars on outside back cover ads. It was not an endorsement of the ad. What is sad, is that the values of the ad are contrary to the Church's values. If it is a struggling magazine, my guess is that it was a difficult decision to print the ad, but the pragmatics of economics forced the decision. Part of me wishes that was the story here, Allen, but in this case, the ad is actually for the Ant. Archdiocese Convention...this is their ad inviting (wealthy) people to the annual convention!
	Quote