DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post

**bQXHsKzS** · 04-17-2012, 09:18 AM

Without commenting on the argument itself, I have to say (as an economic illiterate and liberal arts weenie) that looking at that mass of variables hurt my eyes. Al's concrete-example way of expressing it, assuming you're talking about the same thing, was better. No offense intended.

His post is a lot cleaner and straight-forward. Algebra is a lot more concise than words. I also like his preference for taxes restraining consumption better than my use of ordinary and capital gains income.

In general, I have criticized KH and Kuci for assuming the education of their audience, but Jaguar is always pretty good at explaining things. The way he kept indicating which portions were wage income and which were capital gains would be helpful to a student.

04-17-2012, 09:18 AM	#13
bQXHsKzS Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 494 Senior Member	Without commenting on the argument itself, I have to say (as an economic illiterate and liberal arts weenie) that looking at that mass of variables hurt my eyes. Al's concrete-example way of expressing it, assuming you're talking about the same thing, was better. No offense intended. His post is a lot cleaner and straight-forward. Algebra is a lot more concise than words. I also like his preference for taxes restraining consumption better than my use of ordinary and capital gains income. In general, I have criticized KH and Kuci for assuming the education of their audience, but Jaguar is always pretty good at explaining things. The way he kept indicating which portions were wage income and which were capital gains would be helpful to a student.
	Quote