DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post

**feannigvogten** · 10-25-2005, 07:00 AM

I think the same could have been said about Phil that year.

One could even argue that Phil's greatness is greater than Tiger's, although much less consistent, and his overall game is more exciting.

That said, I can't help but root for Tiger. I don't know why.

his overall game is more exciting because he attempts more dumb shit than tiger. i never understood why people say he has more talent than tiger. he's not as good. tiger is as good off the tee. his iron game is better. he putts better and he is the only one who has the same type of touch around the green as Phil. mentally, he is years beyond what Phil will ever be. basically, his overall game is much more solid than Phil's.

10-25-2005, 07:00 AM	#5
feannigvogten Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 412 Senior Member	I think the same could have been said about Phil that year. One could even argue that Phil's greatness is greater than Tiger's, although much less consistent, and his overall game is more exciting. That said, I can't help but root for Tiger. I don't know why. his overall game is more exciting because he attempts more dumb shit than tiger. i never understood why people say he has more talent than tiger. he's not as good. tiger is as good off the tee. his iron game is better. he putts better and he is the only one who has the same type of touch around the green as Phil. mentally, he is years beyond what Phil will ever be. basically, his overall game is much more solid than Phil's.
	Quote