DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post

**Soulofpostar** · 02-13-2008, 04:19 AM

Wow I didn't know that aggressive dogs were such a problem in England. This sounds like a good scheme to protect both the dogs and the public..

Agreed. The laws in my city are if there's a dog bite/attack/etc, then the dog is automatically microchipped before being returned to owners, regardless of if there are charges or major injuries. That doesn't do anything for if the owner doesn't admit ownership, though.

So would all dogs be required to be chipped as puppies then? Or would all current dogs have to be chipped/registered, too?

02-13-2008, 04:19 AM	#4
Soulofpostar Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 506 Senior Member	Wow I didn't know that aggressive dogs were such a problem in England. This sounds like a good scheme to protect both the dogs and the public.. Agreed. The laws in my city are if there's a dog bite/attack/etc, then the dog is automatically microchipped before being returned to owners, regardless of if there are charges or major injuries. That doesn't do anything for if the owner doesn't admit ownership, though. So would all dogs be required to be chipped as puppies then? Or would all current dogs have to be chipped/registered, too?
	Quote