DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post

**Fuerfsanv** · 09-21-2012, 10:18 AM

This was made easier when 1 person companies were allowed to set up. With some of the forms it asks for person as CEO.

I find most people know that you arent really a CEO if your not, as soon as they talk to you. If they are talking to a CEO as part of a sales call or admin request it becomes clear that you have no other management team anyway.

A point of interest, in my study of human behaviour, I found that the title a person chooses to identify themselves with reflects so much of their personality. Selecting CEO when your not managing a team of executives usually relates to feelings of insecurity and the need to be seen as bigger [better?] than they are. If this wasnt the case, why not use Manager as title instead, or just their name?

09-21-2012, 10:18 AM	#2
Fuerfsanv Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 386 Senior Member	This was made easier when 1 person companies were allowed to set up. With some of the forms it asks for person as CEO. I find most people know that you arent really a CEO if your not, as soon as they talk to you. If they are talking to a CEO as part of a sales call or admin request it becomes clear that you have no other management team anyway. A point of interest, in my study of human behaviour, I found that the title a person chooses to identify themselves with reflects so much of their personality. Selecting CEO when your not managing a team of executives usually relates to feelings of insecurity and the need to be seen as bigger [better?] than they are. If this wasnt the case, why not use Manager as title instead, or just their name?
	Quote