DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post

**Progniusis** · 08-28-2012, 11:17 AM

The short answer: A deal that you cannot possibly win.

You might not win but you come closer when you demand a receipt for any document you autograph. Your autograph is your property. It is valuable and the idea is you want the original back.

These customs fall out of the concept of common law simply because neither gold nor silver back these transactions. Common law requires a minimum of "one dollar and other valuable considerations". A FRN certainly qualifies for "other valuable considerations" but what you are lacking is one dollar. A simple way to fulfill the common law requirement for substance is to affix a red fox stamp [U.K. members will need a lawful pound sterling stamp]. While it is marked one dollar the stamp will set you back anything from $4 to $10 (in single quantities). At this it is worth the effort to be able to remove the contract from equity/admiralty.

08-28-2012, 11:17 AM	#8
Progniusis Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 477 Senior Member	The short answer: A deal that you cannot possibly win. You might not win but you come closer when you demand a receipt for any document you autograph. Your autograph is your property. It is valuable and the idea is you want the original back. These customs fall out of the concept of common law simply because neither gold nor silver back these transactions. Common law requires a minimum of "one dollar and other valuable considerations". A FRN certainly qualifies for "other valuable considerations" but what you are lacking is one dollar. A simple way to fulfill the common law requirement for substance is to affix a red fox stamp [U.K. members will need a lawful pound sterling stamp]. While it is marked one dollar the stamp will set you back anything from $4 to $10 (in single quantities). At this it is worth the effort to be able to remove the contract from equity/admiralty.
	Quote