DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post - Iowa Republican says government illegitimate, declares herself U.S. Senator

**vNQmO2BF** · 07-20-2012, 05:57 PM

Do you use the word 'principal' as a euphemism for a Sovereign?

Rather as the state itself. A self-governing state needs no external governance or agents.

The sense I get from this sentence is what Michael Badnarik described in his book Good To Be King. That all Americans are sovereigns, and the government is their agent. Not the other way around.

Sovereigns get that way by submitting the issue to wager of battel. I know of no other method to resolve a problem in favor of the sovereign.

Once you cancel the government's agency, and the government goes on to do evil things, what is your defense when the government (and the people collectively) are held accountable for those evil things?

Consentientes et agentes pari poena plectentur. Those consenting and those perpetrating are embraced in the same punishment.

Practically, once you renounce the government and adopt your sovereignty, you can still be held accountable with all those who supported the government.

The sovereign is the one who WINS the battel.

Sure the government doesn't represent you, but try to convince the victorious enemies of the government of that.

The enemy of my enemy is my friend.

It may be better to put physical distance between yourself and your errant former 'agent'. If that is possible.

As in Roman times, there is no place on earth where the hand of the government cannot come out of nowhere and pluck you back into their sphere. Rather than cut and run make yourself known to them and aware that you have no fear.

07-20-2012, 05:57 PM	#30
vNQmO2BF Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 529 Senior Member	Do you use the word 'principal' as a euphemism for a Sovereign? Rather as the state itself. A self-governing state needs no external governance or agents. The sense I get from this sentence is what Michael Badnarik described in his book Good To Be King. That all Americans are sovereigns, and the government is their agent. Not the other way around. Sovereigns get that way by submitting the issue to wager of battel. I know of no other method to resolve a problem in favor of the sovereign. Once you cancel the government's agency, and the government goes on to do evil things, what is your defense when the government (and the people collectively) are held accountable for those evil things? Consentientes et agentes pari poena plectentur. Those consenting and those perpetrating are embraced in the same punishment. Practically, once you renounce the government and adopt your sovereignty, you can still be held accountable with all those who supported the government. The sovereign is the one who WINS the battel. Sure the government doesn't represent you, but try to convince the victorious enemies of the government of that. The enemy of my enemy is my friend. It may be better to put physical distance between yourself and your errant former 'agent'. If that is possible. As in Roman times, there is no place on earth where the hand of the government cannot come out of nowhere and pluck you back into their sphere. Rather than cut and run make yourself known to them and aware that you have no fear.
	Quote