DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post

**irrascaft** · 12-11-2009, 08:13 AM

a tweek yes, but this drastic apprach is too much IMO

I think the best would be as follows:

1 - 18
2 - 14
3 - 11
4 - 8
5 - 6
6 - 5
7 - 4
8 - 3
9 - 2
10 - 1

no points for pole or fastest lap. the reward of pole position is starting first on the grid. and with low fuel qualy there is no need for it. It would have been an incentive in these past few years q3 qualy sessions, but not any more.

12-11-2009, 08:13 AM	#18
irrascaft Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 412 Senior Member	a tweek yes, but this drastic apprach is too much IMO I think the best would be as follows: 1 - 18 2 - 14 3 - 11 4 - 8 5 - 6 6 - 5 7 - 4 8 - 3 9 - 2 10 - 1 no points for pole or fastest lap. the reward of pole position is starting first on the grid. and with low fuel qualy there is no need for it. It would have been an incentive in these past few years q3 qualy sessions, but not any more.
	Quote