DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post

**ñàéäèíã** · 09-30-2012, 09:01 AM

That's funny. I love the bullshit rationalizations for not genetic testing her stock. We KNOW that a dog can appear healthy and carry the genes for all kinds of defects. We KNOW if that dog is bred it can pass those genes on to it's offspring and that if that dog or its offspring are bred to another dog with the same recessive gene the pups would either be carriers or have the fault. But it's all in it's "infancy", so don't bother spending the $$.

Ya have to wonder if she doesn't test because she knows her dogs are carrying bad genes.

09-30-2012, 09:01 AM	#24
ñàéäèíã Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 500 Senior Member	That's funny. I love the bullshit rationalizations for not genetic testing her stock. We KNOW that a dog can appear healthy and carry the genes for all kinds of defects. We KNOW if that dog is bred it can pass those genes on to it's offspring and that if that dog or its offspring are bred to another dog with the same recessive gene the pups would either be carriers or have the fault. But it's all in it's "infancy", so don't bother spending the $$. Ya have to wonder if she doesn't test because she knows her dogs are carrying bad genes.
	Quote