DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post - Was the landlord in the wrong or did he have the right to change his mind

**QysnZWB4** · 11-30-2010, 09:03 PM

Legally, I think he was in the wrong.

Although, in our society, with ignorance even from judges and lawyers, I can see a lawyer arguing "well this dog IS a pit bull" while the other lawyer argues, "no, it's not" and it could go on all day.

I don't think they should have had to give up the dog - they had in a written, legal binding contract that the dog was allow, period. It doesn't matter if he found out it "was a pit bull" or not, in the contract it says allowed. He's just pissed he had to pay more money, sounds like a greedy bastard to me.

I would've went to the insurance company and also fought it, or found a different renters insurance that covered my dog at no extra cost.

Though, I'm not a lawyer, but I know a contract is a legal binding document.

11-30-2010, 09:03 PM	#14
QysnZWB4 Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 482 Senior Member	Legally, I think he was in the wrong. Although, in our society, with ignorance even from judges and lawyers, I can see a lawyer arguing "well this dog IS a pit bull" while the other lawyer argues, "no, it's not" and it could go on all day. I don't think they should have had to give up the dog - they had in a written, legal binding contract that the dog was allow, period. It doesn't matter if he found out it "was a pit bull" or not, in the contract it says allowed. He's just pissed he had to pay more money, sounds like a greedy bastard to me. I would've went to the insurance company and also fought it, or found a different renters insurance that covered my dog at no extra cost. Though, I'm not a lawyer, but I know a contract is a legal binding document.
	Quote