View Single Post
Old 11-22-2007, 03:28 AM   #17
SHUSIATULSE

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
376
Senior Member
Default
Actually just saying weight is not important takes that part of the standard out of context. There is much more to that
To sum up,
Yes the UKC standard lists the desired weights and after that goes into talking about that the weight and also the height are both less important than the dog having correct proportions. Dogs above the listed weights are not penalized in the show ring unless they are rangy or massive which would make them out of proportion

here is a link to the UKC standard
http://www.apbtconformation.com/ukcstandard.htm

They can't pass a dog off that has crappy proportions... at least not to as judge that knows the breed and goes by the standard
I agree with you totally on this a male APBT cant have Lil short legs and a wide body and a 28 inch head and be 35-60 pounds and be called a standard size APBT, the weight must be proportionate to his body.
SHUSIATULSE is offline


 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:39 PM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity