DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post

**Uzezqelj** · 08-08-2009, 07:31 PM

I've never even heard of a "strategic lag". In my head that sounds like "intentional miss". It's completely contrary to the way I approach the game. I will lay up on a long approach shot if that seems to be the correct strategic maneuver, but when I'm putting, the hole is always going to be my target. I feel that I have a better chance of getting close by aiming at a 4.25" circle than I do by aiming at a 3 foot or 4 foot or 6 foot circle. And if I'm aiming at and trying to hit the hole, it might just go in.

I simply can't play any differently.

Amen to that!

Besides, it's a lot less complicated to aim at the hole than it is to be drawing imaginary circles on the green.

-JP

08-08-2009, 07:31 PM	#18
Uzezqelj Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 585 Senior Member	I've never even heard of a "strategic lag". In my head that sounds like "intentional miss". It's completely contrary to the way I approach the game. I will lay up on a long approach shot if that seems to be the correct strategic maneuver, but when I'm putting, the hole is always going to be my target. I feel that I have a better chance of getting close by aiming at a 4.25" circle than I do by aiming at a 3 foot or 4 foot or 6 foot circle. And if I'm aiming at and trying to hit the hole, it might just go in. I simply can't play any differently. Amen to that! Besides, it's a lot less complicated to aim at the hole than it is to be drawing imaginary circles on the green. -JP
	Quote