DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post

**mas-dkt-sive** · 08-18-2009, 02:41 AM

You may dislike IBF,But his statement is true.Phil is by far one of the worst putter inside 5 ft(I'm referring to pro's who are ranked inside the top 15.And Yes, I know Sergio is worst along with Vjay). All thanks to Pelz.Phil's short game was so much better before Pelz got his hands onto him

Phil was one of the great all time feel players around the greens. Pelz is analytical... I thought it could have been a good combination if Phil could have picked up just the analytical stuff to make decisions about the best shot, but it looks like he has picked up the swing stuff instead. Pelz teaches a really mechanical concept of taking the club back three different distances to produce certain shots...nothing "feel" about any of it. I thought Phil knew how to execute the shots, he just made bad decisions on which shots to play. Pelz could have helped with that. Too bad it has worked out like it has.

08-18-2009, 02:41 AM	#7
mas-dkt-sive Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 516 Senior Member	You may dislike IBF,But his statement is true.Phil is by far one of the worst putter inside 5 ft(I'm referring to pro's who are ranked inside the top 15.And Yes, I know Sergio is worst along with Vjay). All thanks to Pelz.Phil's short game was so much better before Pelz got his hands onto him Phil was one of the great all time feel players around the greens. Pelz is analytical... I thought it could have been a good combination if Phil could have picked up just the analytical stuff to make decisions about the best shot, but it looks like he has picked up the swing stuff instead. Pelz teaches a really mechanical concept of taking the club back three different distances to produce certain shots...nothing "feel" about any of it. I thought Phil knew how to execute the shots, he just made bad decisions on which shots to play. Pelz could have helped with that. Too bad it has worked out like it has.
	Quote