DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post

**RicyReetred** · 07-14-2011, 05:58 PM

There is no back peddling, Prosecutors will 100% certain seek life in prison. Whether they attain that judgement is a different matter. If it had been a woman who was forcibly circumcised by her husband, the article would say will instead of could. No question.

My argument hasn't changed. It was always about the language and discrepancy between men and women.

No it wouldn't! The wording is the standard format for reporting on someone being charged with a crime. There is no conviction yet, therefore any potential sentence is a "might" and not a "could".

Come on, you're on a wind up aren't you......?

07-14-2011, 05:58 PM	#15
RicyReetred Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 577 Senior Member	There is no back peddling, Prosecutors will 100% certain seek life in prison. Whether they attain that judgement is a different matter. If it had been a woman who was forcibly circumcised by her husband, the article would say will instead of could. No question. My argument hasn't changed. It was always about the language and discrepancy between men and women. No it wouldn't! The wording is the standard format for reporting on someone being charged with a crime. There is no conviction yet, therefore any potential sentence is a "might" and not a "could". Come on, you're on a wind up aren't you......?
	Quote