DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post

**ssupermegatone** · 08-18-2010, 12:55 PM

The War on Terror should have been limited to Afghanistan, at least at first. One thing at a time is something I personally feel works best. Go to Iraq after the nation is stable and the Taliban are rounded up.

In 2003 I, like many others, thought there were in fact WMD's in Iraq and Saddam was hellbent on going after the west.

Granted, it's good that he's not in power anymore but I wonder how different our world would be today if Osama Bin Laden had been captured just because there were an extra 150,000 troops in Afghanistan instead of being spread thin in Iraq.

08-18-2010, 12:55 PM	#3
ssupermegatone Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 514 Senior Member	The War on Terror should have been limited to Afghanistan, at least at first. One thing at a time is something I personally feel works best. Go to Iraq after the nation is stable and the Taliban are rounded up. In 2003 I, like many others, thought there were in fact WMD's in Iraq and Saddam was hellbent on going after the west. Granted, it's good that he's not in power anymore but I wonder how different our world would be today if Osama Bin Laden had been captured just because there were an extra 150,000 troops in Afghanistan instead of being spread thin in Iraq.
	Quote