View Single Post
Old 04-23-2008, 07:53 AM   #6
Savviioor

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
609
Senior Member
Default
Sports bikes are not exactly the most fuel efficient mode of transportation out there - especially when you consider that you can not carry any cargo, bad weather prevents you from riding, the [expensive] tires need to be replaced regularly, expensive insurance, and simply the danger of riding amongst other much larger vehicles. You would be better off picking up a small hatchback or sedan that has a fuel efficient engine under the hood/bonnet.
1. You don't have to choose a sports bike, obviously.
2. My bike has a 1:20 usage (liters/km), that's a lot better than most cars I believe.
3. Do people really need a whole lot more stuff than they can fit in a backpack? Larger bikes with those cases attached can easily carry more stuff.
4. Weather would have to be really bad to stop you from riding (really bad = snow).
5. The front tire usually lasts several seasons, my rear tire costs some €150 and lasts a whole year.
6. Insurance is dead cheap! I pay €120 a year for my insurance, I'd pay at least twice as much with a small car.

While a motor isn't always a good alternative for a small car, your arguments certainly don't hold very well either.
Savviioor is offline


 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:59 PM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity