DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post

**j2Y6Ysmb** · 06-19-2012, 10:29 PM

@iSoK
Similar thoughts came to my mind when I heard of the problem for the first time.
And I do suppose that what you say is the correct answer.
It is always better to keep the things simple.
But some times one has to indulge persistent people so for their benefit some discussion of little bit of details will not be a bad idea.

My apologies if my post hurt you, that was not my intention.

Simplicity does not always mean truth, I think the truth is far more complicated than we can imagine.
Could you be more clear about your last sentence? I didn't get it.
'But some times one has to indulge persistent people so for their benefit some discussion of little bit of details will not be a bad idea.'

And what are your thoughts on this subject?

06-19-2012, 10:29 PM	#6
j2Y6Ysmb Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 398 Senior Member	@iSoK Similar thoughts came to my mind when I heard of the problem for the first time. And I do suppose that what you say is the correct answer. It is always better to keep the things simple. But some times one has to indulge persistent people so for their benefit some discussion of little bit of details will not be a bad idea. My apologies if my post hurt you, that was not my intention. Simplicity does not always mean truth, I think the truth is far more complicated than we can imagine. Could you be more clear about your last sentence? I didn't get it. 'But some times one has to indulge persistent people so for their benefit some discussion of little bit of details will not be a bad idea.' And what are your thoughts on this subject?
	Quote