Isn't Ml. Numani (the author of the above book) the person who wrote a book claiming that most of the accusations agains ibn abdul Wahhab are a result of 'propaganda' by Arab 'ulema? As learned as he might be I find it uncomfortable in relying upon anything he might say. Confusion is probably the best thing deobandis are good at propagating despite their knowledge..I just don't know what to make of them. The Ameer of this forum says that a certain imam of the Haram is a 'hardcore wahhabi' and staunch anti-'ashari' yet we see other deobandi ulema allegedly proclaim the same imam as the 'greatest leader of muslims in our time' (!!!).. Then we see deobandis denouncing the commemoration of the Mawlid, yet they have no problems in organising a 150th Birthday Bash for Deoband!!! With Sh. Ibn Baz as the guest of honour no less! If the confusion didn't frustrate the hell out of me, I'd be laughing my head off! So conclusion, for me personally, when it comes to matters of 'contraversy' I don't take deobandis seriously anymore as I'm sure they can be accused of what they are accusing others for too no doubt.