DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post

**dianakroshXX** · 12-27-2011, 09:30 PM

Again, it is important to see what the senior scholars of Syria say regarding the matter. The Al Saud ruling dynasty and their fataawa committee has no jurisdiction in Syria and is not credible in matters affecting the situation of muslims in any state other than Saudi.

Yes, some Ashab (Ra) and Tabi'een did rebel against the Umayyad leaders after Muawiyya and armies were sent by Marwan and then his Abdul Malik to neutralise them - this was a trajedy in which many Muslims were killed. But remember, others like Ibn Abbas (Ra) excepted rule from Umayyad leaders, like Abdul Malik, over that of Abdullah Ibn Zubair (Ra) in Makkah. While Abdullah Ibn Umar (Ra) would not involve himself in any power struggle, holding a neutral position. Anas Ibn Malik (Ra) did not rebel against Hajjaj and accepted him Hakim over the east of the empire - dealing with reality and doing the best you can within your limits according to Quran and Sunnah. Fighting only weakens muslims.

Allahu A'lam

The ironic thing about Iranian supporters like you is that you'll support the Ahl al-Bayt uprisings against tyrants, but not sunni uprisings against the tyrant syrian government. You yourself brought up 'Abdu Llah b. Zubair (and Imam al-Husayn, for that matter). If they saw it fit to rebel, why can't the Syrians?

Even more ironic is that you'll support the revolutions in Bahrain, but when it comes to Syria, you say we have to "deal with reality" and "fighting only weakens Muslims". Why don't you tell the Bahraini protestors the same thing? Whatever Saudi Arabia is guilty of towards Syria, Iran is guilty of the same towards Bahrain, if not more.

Shaykh al-Buti is basically alone in his fatawa. What about all the other sufi scholars who have spoken up?

If it's obvious why the Saudis are issuing fatawa in aid of the syrian revolution, it's just as obvious why Iran and its supporters - like you - are doing the opposite.

12-27-2011, 09:30 PM	#13
dianakroshXX Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 468 Senior Member	Again, it is important to see what the senior scholars of Syria say regarding the matter. The Al Saud ruling dynasty and their fataawa committee has no jurisdiction in Syria and is not credible in matters affecting the situation of muslims in any state other than Saudi. Yes, some Ashab (Ra) and Tabi'een did rebel against the Umayyad leaders after Muawiyya and armies were sent by Marwan and then his Abdul Malik to neutralise them - this was a trajedy in which many Muslims were killed. But remember, others like Ibn Abbas (Ra) excepted rule from Umayyad leaders, like Abdul Malik, over that of Abdullah Ibn Zubair (Ra) in Makkah. While Abdullah Ibn Umar (Ra) would not involve himself in any power struggle, holding a neutral position. Anas Ibn Malik (Ra) did not rebel against Hajjaj and accepted him Hakim over the east of the empire - dealing with reality and doing the best you can within your limits according to Quran and Sunnah. Fighting only weakens muslims. Allahu A'lam The ironic thing about Iranian supporters like you is that you'll support the Ahl al-Bayt uprisings against tyrants, but not sunni uprisings against the tyrant syrian government. You yourself brought up 'Abdu Llah b. Zubair (and Imam al-Husayn, for that matter). If they saw it fit to rebel, why can't the Syrians? Even more ironic is that you'll support the revolutions in Bahrain, but when it comes to Syria, you say we have to "deal with reality" and "fighting only weakens Muslims". Why don't you tell the Bahraini protestors the same thing? Whatever Saudi Arabia is guilty of towards Syria, Iran is guilty of the same towards Bahrain, if not more. Shaykh al-Buti is basically alone in his fatawa. What about all the other sufi scholars who have spoken up? If it's obvious why the Saudis are issuing fatawa in aid of the syrian revolution, it's just as obvious why Iran and its supporters - like you - are doing the opposite.
	Quote