DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post

**VtLe67WR** · 01-30-2006, 05:29 PM

-he admitted his wiretapping was illegal

well, we all know the president had never said anything of the sort, and in fact he has mainted that everything he has done is illegal.

Your right. Everything he has done IS illegal.

Alright buddy. Time for a quick lesson in law.

If the current LAW states that the President must get a warrant from a court to follow out this wiretapping...Not getting one..is...You guessed it! ILLEGAL!

Now I don't want to hear any of this bullsh*t that they take too long. They have 3 judges set up at a time for an emergency and it can only take SECONDS to obtain one...SECONDS! Yet he persists to break the law!

He obviously doesn't care for the law. I don't want a King ruling my country, thank you.

Also, don't even THINK of trying to say he was using his Commander in Chief power to do it. Because that is a PURELY MILITARIAL POWER. It doesn't give him the right at all. Both strict and loose constructionalists will tell you that, because it's factual.

01-30-2006, 05:29 PM	#38
VtLe67WR Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 435 Senior Member	-he admitted his wiretapping was illegal well, we all know the president had never said anything of the sort, and in fact he has mainted that everything he has done is illegal. Your right. Everything he has done IS illegal. Alright buddy. Time for a quick lesson in law. If the current LAW states that the President must get a warrant from a court to follow out this wiretapping...Not getting one..is...You guessed it! ILLEGAL! Now I don't want to hear any of this bullsht that they take too long. They have 3 judges set up at a time for an emergency and it can only take SECONDS to obtain one...SECONDS! Yet he persists to break the law! He obviously doesn't care for the law. I don't want a King ruling my country, thank you. Also, don't even THINK of trying to say he was using his Commander in Chief power to do it. Because that is a PURELY MILITARIAL POWER*. It doesn't give him the right at all. Both strict and loose constructionalists will tell you that, because it's factual.
	Quote