Lets break down your original argument: -"his blatant irgorance of the law (wll, he didn't follow it did he)" -"The president ignored [FISA]" -"His sordid arguements... are litteral GARBAGE" -"His arrogance has gotten a'hold of him." Ive alreaday referenced the various legal arguments which lay out the legal basis for the presidents actions, thus showing no ignorance of the law. In addition there is evidence showing that the President did use the FISA process in many cases, thus showing he did not ignore FISA. Both of those together seem to indicate that his arguments are not garbage nor that he is being arrogant. Add on to that that past presidents have not used FISA for warrantless searches of Americans, and you have a strong case for legality. So, unless you come up with something new and a factual basis for it, I dont we are going to learn anything here.