DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post

**blenIgnigeSef** · 01-20-2006, 09:21 PM

That wasn't what I was looking for. "T'was discussion." Apparently "My mistake"

I said I'll give you a learned and reasonable critique of your proposals - or discuss them if you prefer that term. However, it is impossible to do without the basic assertion of a problem. Without a definition of a problem, your solutions just hang in the air as your personal wishlist. That is to say, they have no substantive meaning. Indeed, several of your proscriptions are contradictory which is why I inquired as to the problem that is proposed to be solved by such 'innovations'.

You seem to be a theorist rather than an Activist, My error

Yes, I approach politics and philosophy from a theoretical perspective. It is a product of my university education in these fields. I do have an Honours BA degree in Political Science (and an MA in Political Philosophy). Obviously I'm not qualified to assess your proposals.

Let's see now, "self evident that it is "LIKELY"???? I think that is quite obvious, at least to the majority of the people on this forum.

Rather it is obvious to an apparently large number of Americans (including yourself) that anything American is apparently superior to all other things. This premise is held on faith and patriotism (and a healthy dose of propaganda), not any learned substantiation.

HMM, I beleive that has been determined by the majority of the people of the United States. Don't you know anyone who lives south of your border, and north of mine????

Looks like you are moving into Simon territory now - asserting that I am wrong by definition of you being right.

Well, I got to admit--------------
You've lost me there

Indeed. I've offered a clear and obvious critique based on real world evidence against your opening statement upon which you base your proposals and you are speechless in reply.

SEE MY FIRST COMMENT, Further, for your edification, It is my government, and I see many things wrong with it, and my plan is just a partial solution(subject of course to being put into effect)

It isn't a "solution" until the problem is identified. Merely asserting that you don't like the present way the US government is run does not constitute a problem for anyone but you.

As for my "edification", I respectfully submit that trying to play consdescention games with me is quite tiresome.

HMM, back to my original response AGAIN.

Okie dokie.

(again)

01-20-2006, 09:21 PM	#28
blenIgnigeSef Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 426 Senior Member	That wasn't what I was looking for. "T'was discussion." Apparently "My mistake" I said I'll give you a learned and reasonable critique of your proposals - or discuss them if you prefer that term. However, it is impossible to do without the basic assertion of a problem. Without a definition of a problem, your solutions just hang in the air as your personal wishlist. That is to say, they have no substantive meaning. Indeed, several of your proscriptions are contradictory which is why I inquired as to the problem that is proposed to be solved by such 'innovations'. You seem to be a theorist rather than an Activist, My error Yes, I approach politics and philosophy from a theoretical perspective. It is a product of my university education in these fields. I do have an Honours BA degree in Political Science (and an MA in Political Philosophy). Obviously I'm not qualified to assess your proposals. Let's see now, "self evident that it is "LIKELY"???? I think that is quite obvious, at least to the majority of the people on this forum. Rather it is obvious to an apparently large number of Americans (including yourself) that anything American is apparently superior to all other things. This premise is held on faith and patriotism (and a healthy dose of propaganda), not any learned substantiation. HMM, I beleive that has been determined by the majority of the people of the United States. Don't you know anyone who lives south of your border, and north of mine???? Looks like you are moving into Simon territory now - asserting that I am wrong by definition of you being right. Well, I got to admit-------------- You've lost me there Indeed. I've offered a clear and obvious critique based on real world evidence against your opening statement upon which you base your proposals and you are speechless in reply. SEE MY FIRST COMMENT, Further, for your edification, It is my government, and I see many things wrong with it, and my plan is just a partial solution(subject of course to being put into effect) It isn't a "solution" until the problem is identified. Merely asserting that you don't like the present way the US government is run does not constitute a problem for anyone but you. As for my "edification", I respectfully submit that trying to play consdescention games with me is quite tiresome. HMM, back to my original response AGAIN. Okie dokie. (again)
	Quote