DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post

**CDCL7WKJ** · 01-19-2006, 02:01 PM

Picked Clinton and Clark.

The former has said her share of idiocies lately, I'll concede, but I think her priorities are properly in order and tales of her tyrannical streak are greatly exaggerated.

The latter is who I wanted to vote for in 2004. A practical military commander who understands the limits of America's forces, but isn't going to be soft on terror out of some mushy-headed liberalism.

01-19-2006, 02:01 PM	#3
CDCL7WKJ Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 472 Senior Member	Picked Clinton and Clark. The former has said her share of idiocies lately, I'll concede, but I think her priorities are properly in order and tales of her tyrannical streak are greatly exaggerated. The latter is who I wanted to vote for in 2004. A practical military commander who understands the limits of America's forces, but isn't going to be soft on terror out of some mushy-headed liberalism.
	Quote