DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post

**hygtfrdes** · 01-01-2006, 02:08 AM

I had never heard of it until this morning, and that doesn't change the posibility that there are others in the same boat. However, Since you say it has been debated before, Would you care to tell me why you think the article rates your lovely description???

First of all, a real doctor wouldn't try and diagnose someone from afar. Secondly, a real doctor wouldn't go public with his opinion about the mental health of anyone, much less, the POTUS.
The guy is nothing more than a quack out to make a buck by telling Democrats what they want to hear.

01-01-2006, 02:08 AM	#8
hygtfrdes Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 434 Senior Member	I had never heard of it until this morning, and that doesn't change the posibility that there are others in the same boat. However, Since you say it has been debated before, Would you care to tell me why you think the article rates your lovely description??? First of all, a real doctor wouldn't try and diagnose someone from afar. Secondly, a real doctor wouldn't go public with his opinion about the mental health of anyone, much less, the POTUS. The guy is nothing more than a quack out to make a buck by telling Democrats what they want to hear.
	Quote