[SHaEFU0i]

No, the least of all possible evils is the least evil solution. I don't see the difference between this and the best solution(must be trivial, but please, develop ) (assuming that evil, in this expression, means "bad" ) Yeah, what he said!

If you believe that human liberty is very important, you are probably a classical liberal. Yes.

If you believe that human liberty is secondary to, or only an adornment to, the liberty of capital, then Libertarianism is the right place to be. How so? Libertarians promote the liberty of capital because without it, there cannot be human liberty, not as a greater goal of some sort. (Indentured servitude, being a small step up from slavery, is the best example - One was technically free, but was not entitled to any of the fruits of their labors, and thus beholden to their master for ongoing sustenance. If such an arrangement were entered into willingly, then so be it, but to have it legislated or otherwise forced is antithetical to Libertarianism.)