DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post

**xyupi** · 12-09-2005, 02:00 PM

No, but the campus should have. Even despite that I think the hecklers were rude, the student govt spent $16,000 for Coulter to come speak, and that money essentialy went to waste, based on the actions of a few. I wonder why the campus security didnt remove the hecklers.

Yes - that sounds right. If the unviersity paid money, then the onus is on them to remove any disruptive people (and to make this policy known in advance). It is simply an economic matter of protecting one's investment, as opposed to any sort of legal or political matter, IMO.

12-09-2005, 02:00 PM	#20
xyupi Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 541 Senior Member	No, but the campus should have. Even despite that I think the hecklers were rude, the student govt spent $16,000 for Coulter to come speak, and that money essentialy went to waste, based on the actions of a few. I wonder why the campus security didnt remove the hecklers. Yes - that sounds right. If the unviersity paid money, then the onus is on them to remove any disruptive people (and to make this policy known in advance). It is simply an economic matter of protecting one's investment, as opposed to any sort of legal or political matter, IMO.
	Quote