DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post

**Angelinaaiiiiiiiii** · 12-09-2005, 02:13 PM

Yes - that sounds right. If the unviersity paid money, then the onus is on them to remove any disruptive people (and to make this policy known in advance). It is simply an economic matter of protecting one's investment, as opposed to any sort of legal or political matter, IMO.

Seems reasonable. In both cases I'm refering to, the PM appearances were during election campaigns and were not formal invitations as such.

12-09-2005, 02:13 PM	#21
Angelinaaiiiiiiiii Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 383 Senior Member	Yes - that sounds right. If the unviersity paid money, then the onus is on them to remove any disruptive people (and to make this policy known in advance). It is simply an economic matter of protecting one's investment, as opposed to any sort of legal or political matter, IMO. Seems reasonable. In both cases I'm refering to, the PM appearances were during election campaigns and were not formal invitations as such.
	Quote