DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post - 9/11 WTC controlled demolition, terrorists in Bush Admin

**Haremporblape** · 02-12-2006, 08:50 PM

QUOTE
1. Explosions occuring on sides of building, far below where levels are collapsing and before there began to be a collaps, in video footage.
2. The presence of large quantities of molten steel in the debris, when burning jet fuel cannot melt steel.
3. Never has a building collapsed into its own footprint except thru controlled demolition. Buildings which collapse in earthquakes have fallen to the side.
4. Dip in the top of WTC 7 when it collapsed characteristic of controlled demolition.
5. Buildings fell at nearly the same rate as free-fall, which would be impossible unless supporting structure underneath had first been demolished.
6. Never before has a steel frame building collapsed solely due to fire, as WTC 7 did, and the other two apparently as well since the plane collisions themselves did not appear to cause collapse.

Controlled deomlition better fits the available observations of the fall. Viewing the video footage, the way the WTC towers fell certainly looks exactly like footage from controlled demolitions of large buildings.
QUOTE END

SIMPEL EXPLANATION

WTC 1 and 2 both had thick steel barriers up to about the 80 th. floor. From there and up the steel barriers were under half as thick. Both the planes flew in just above the 80 th. floor and crushed many of the those thin steel barriers. That means about 30 floors only supported by to few thin steel barriers. This combined with the extreme heat from the planefire might not have melted the rest of the thin steel barriers but certanly weakened them. Only outcoming result: Reverse domino effect. Go figure!

MAY THIS POST END THIS GEEKY THREAD!

02-12-2006, 08:50 PM	#27
Haremporblape Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 440 Senior Member	QUOTE 1. Explosions occuring on sides of building, far below where levels are collapsing and before there began to be a collaps, in video footage. 2. The presence of large quantities of molten steel in the debris, when burning jet fuel cannot melt steel. 3. Never has a building collapsed into its own footprint except thru controlled demolition. Buildings which collapse in earthquakes have fallen to the side. 4. Dip in the top of WTC 7 when it collapsed characteristic of controlled demolition. 5. Buildings fell at nearly the same rate as free-fall, which would be impossible unless supporting structure underneath had first been demolished. 6. Never before has a steel frame building collapsed solely due to fire, as WTC 7 did, and the other two apparently as well since the plane collisions themselves did not appear to cause collapse. Controlled deomlition better fits the available observations of the fall. Viewing the video footage, the way the WTC towers fell certainly looks exactly like footage from controlled demolitions of large buildings. QUOTE END SIMPEL EXPLANATION WTC 1 and 2 both had thick steel barriers up to about the 80 th. floor. From there and up the steel barriers were under half as thick. Both the planes flew in just above the 80 th. floor and crushed many of the those thin steel barriers. That means about 30 floors only supported by to few thin steel barriers. This combined with the extreme heat from the planefire might not have melted the rest of the thin steel barriers but certanly weakened them. Only outcoming result: Reverse domino effect. Go figure! MAY THIS POST END THIS GEEKY THREAD!
	Quote