DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post

**Flankrene** · 03-10-2006, 10:15 PM

Shouldn't we also include the democratswho received money from him like the leader of the dems in the Senate like Harry Reid who then went on to pettition Indian tribes on his behalf?

I have no problem with that at all. It will be interesting to see who is affected, partisanship aside (as I don't really have any when US politics is concerned). I was simply countering the implication that Democrats alone are to gain from this deal, and that the track record lately is in their (Dems) favor.

03-10-2006, 10:15 PM	#6
Flankrene Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 325 Senior Member	Shouldn't we also include the democratswho received money from him like the leader of the dems in the Senate like Harry Reid who then went on to pettition Indian tribes on his behalf? I have no problem with that at all. It will be interesting to see who is affected, partisanship aside (as I don't really have any when US politics is concerned). I was simply countering the implication that Democrats alone are to gain from this deal, and that the track record lately is in their (Dems) favor.
	Quote