DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post

**weaddercaps** · 02-14-2006, 03:11 PM

I agree with the second part of your sentence. However, the first part would just cause Iraq to fall in the terrorists hands. Making them a stronger opponent in the long run.

It's already in the hands of the terrorists,as much as the cities of the US are under the control of gangs. would you suggest we just keep the military there as a police force for the next 50 or so years?

02-14-2006, 03:11 PM	#13
weaddercaps Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 594 Senior Member	I agree with the second part of your sentence. However, the first part would just cause Iraq to fall in the terrorists hands. Making them a stronger opponent in the long run. It's already in the hands of the terrorists,as much as the cities of the US are under the control of gangs. would you suggest we just keep the military there as a police force for the next 50 or so years?
	Quote