DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post

**kictainiSot** · 02-16-2006, 04:13 AM

Yes. Terrorists have no nation, "state" as you presented it, thus it is difficult to assault terrorists at home.
What defence have you shown to your country, other than huge amounts of money to your army? What defences?
Saddams WMDs. How many times this has been presented? I still see no weapons. How could have Iraq strike at you?
Why are leaders of all other nations allowing your leader to rule? Because it is his to rule, although in both times the election was more than shaky. U.S. has zero right to attack and invade independent nations.

Oh, so i was lied to when we were told they were in Afghanistan? Ok, I see your logic now, or lack there of. And yes, Iraq had WMD's, it has been proven that they were moved to Syria.

How many times do I have to say it, there have been numerous attacks prevented since we started defending ourselves.

The elections have never been shaky here. The 2000 election was close, but not shaky in the least bit, the 2004 election was very decisive, how does that constitute being shaky?

You should go on and keep believing everything you're spoon-fed by the news media all across the world, funny, they never report wll the good things that are happening in Iraq. I know you're going to tell me that there are no good things happening, but it's been well documented by numerous reliable sources the good things that are happening. So I'll tell you why you never hear of the good things, it's because the good things that are taking place in Iraq would trump the bad things that are being reported, and since many such as yourself are invested in the defeat of the U.S. all you want to hear is doom and gloom.

I'm done with this thread because it's going nowhere.

Todd

02-16-2006, 04:13 AM	#32
kictainiSot Join Date Nov 2005 Posts 536 Senior Member	Yes. Terrorists have no nation, "state" as you presented it, thus it is difficult to assault terrorists at home. What defence have you shown to your country, other than huge amounts of money to your army? What defences? Saddams WMDs. How many times this has been presented? I still see no weapons. How could have Iraq strike at you? Why are leaders of all other nations allowing your leader to rule? Because it is his to rule, although in both times the election was more than shaky. U.S. has zero right to attack and invade independent nations. Oh, so i was lied to when we were told they were in Afghanistan? Ok, I see your logic now, or lack there of. And yes, Iraq had WMD's, it has been proven that they were moved to Syria. How many times do I have to say it, there have been numerous attacks prevented since we started defending ourselves. The elections have never been shaky here. The 2000 election was close, but not shaky in the least bit, the 2004 election was very decisive, how does that constitute being shaky? You should go on and keep believing everything you're spoon-fed by the news media all across the world, funny, they never report wll the good things that are happening in Iraq. I know you're going to tell me that there are no good things happening, but it's been well documented by numerous reliable sources the good things that are happening. So I'll tell you why you never hear of the good things, it's because the good things that are taking place in Iraq would trump the bad things that are being reported, and since many such as yourself are invested in the defeat of the U.S. all you want to hear is doom and gloom. I'm done with this thread because it's going nowhere. Todd
	Quote