View Single Post
Old 02-11-2006, 11:09 AM   #33
idobestbuyonlinepp

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
589
Senior Member
Default
It tells me that you didn't read the thread
Danny is hardly a "republican partisan". He called for Dean to go.
Yes, I realise that Danny is not a "republican partisan" at all.

It was the reactions of the 'republican partisans' in this thread that I was commenting upon.

As for Dean, he's certainly shaking up the DNC establishment - trying to replace the organising dependence upon big labour with a more solid and well-organised grass-roots and net-roots base. That is good politics but is likely to raise a point of conflict with the 'status quo' Democrats who don't like the aggressive internal changes that have their goal of reducing the power of the DNC. In other words, Dean is 'decentralising' the Democratic party and the big-wigs definitely don't like it. On this basis, it is quite possible that some Democratic partisans may object to Dean.

As noted previously, the chairman of the DNC does not control or influence policy in any way - it is purely an 'organising' position. In other words, only partisan fanatics and political junkies pay attention to what he says.
idobestbuyonlinepp is offline


 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:43 AM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity