DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post - As Long As We're Getting Rid of the 4th Amendment...

**cindygirl** · 02-06-2006, 04:54 PM

Frankly it is you that is taking a partisan road here. Your right there is no concrete proof and how could there be since all the President feels he has to do is wrap himself in the flag assert that national security prevents him from disussing anything pertaining to the issue, expect what he feels will defend his position in a round about way, and then shut down the topic by claiming if you pursue it yu are harmning the nation. What this really boils down to is you choose to believe and trust Bush. I frankly after the past couple of years do not trust him. You, since you do trust him, do not feel any further information is necessary. I since I do not trust him feel it is up to Congress to assert their oversight responsibilities and take action to find out if there has been a violation of the law. THe point here is we are both basing what we feel should be done on relatively uniformed opinion on the matter since it has been so secretive. You do not know he has not violated the law, and I do not know he has. THe difference is I want to find out and I get the feeling you don't.

This is a classified program about national security and it is common sense that details of the program should not be made public. The intelligence committee in congress however is cleared for that informaiton and are investigating it. Everything I stated were the facts as has been made public, whereas the poster had 0 facts. I think my point was made.

02-06-2006, 04:54 PM	#23
cindygirl Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 477 Senior Member	Frankly it is you that is taking a partisan road here. Your right there is no concrete proof and how could there be since all the President feels he has to do is wrap himself in the flag assert that national security prevents him from disussing anything pertaining to the issue, expect what he feels will defend his position in a round about way, and then shut down the topic by claiming if you pursue it yu are harmning the nation. What this really boils down to is you choose to believe and trust Bush. I frankly after the past couple of years do not trust him. You, since you do trust him, do not feel any further information is necessary. I since I do not trust him feel it is up to Congress to assert their oversight responsibilities and take action to find out if there has been a violation of the law. THe point here is we are both basing what we feel should be done on relatively uniformed opinion on the matter since it has been so secretive. You do not know he has not violated the law, and I do not know he has. THe difference is I want to find out and I get the feeling you don't. This is a classified program about national security and it is common sense that details of the program should not be made public. The intelligence committee in congress however is cleared for that informaiton and are investigating it. Everything I stated were the facts as has been made public, whereas the poster had 0 facts. I think my point was made.
	Quote