View Single Post
Old 02-01-2006, 09:31 PM   #2
paulaglober

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
357
Senior Member
Default
Bush's plan to wean US off imported oil: ambitious enough?

Right direction, say energy gurus. But some puzzle over R&D that won't cut oil demand.
More. . .

I'm surprised that no one has started this thread already.
I suppose the rabbid Bush haters don't like the fact that basically it's as I have been posting all along.
There is no real "alternative" energy.
Read the rest of the article because it tells the harsh truth.
Yes, there is lot's of worthless pork in the Bush plan, but the cruel truth is we have little choice and reality bites.
The hard truth is there is no alternative to oil.
Going to alternatives like fuel cells, or any other hydrogen based plan is stupid since it requires more energy to produce the hydrogen than what you get out. In effect making our problems worse.
The same goes for gasohol and a lot of the other crackpot ideas.
I don't think it's correct to say "There is no real "alternative" energy".

Maybe there IS, maybe there ISN'T. We, and the market(s), are only indifferently interested right now in looking at other things.

The thing is, oil and coal and all these "energy" sources aren't in an infinite suppy.

While they SEEM like they are today, we aren't USING them very efficiently.

Drive down a highway in America and see what's on the road.

Anyways.

Lets pretend that tomorrow there was no more oil on Earth (the day may come).

What would happen ?
paulaglober is offline


 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:12 PM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity