DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post

**GooogleGuy** · 02-09-2006, 10:44 PM

not to nitpick you, but Antonio Villaragosa was not the mayor at the time this was supposed to have occured. So it is not surprising that he was not told.

Not a problem. I was just going by what I heard on the news.

I found the story here

Emphasizing that there is no imminent threat to his city, Los Angeles Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa said during a Thursday news conference that he had already heard about the 2002 threat, but Thursday was the first time he'd learned the details. Sorry for the mix-up. He did know about the plot, but not the details.

02-09-2006, 10:44 PM	#12
GooogleGuy Join Date Nov 2005 Posts 365 Senior Member	not to nitpick you, but Antonio Villaragosa was not the mayor at the time this was supposed to have occured. So it is not surprising that he was not told. Not a problem. I was just going by what I heard on the news. I found the story here Emphasizing that there is no imminent threat to his city, Los Angeles Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa said during a Thursday news conference that he had already heard about the 2002 threat, but Thursday was the first time he'd learned the details. Sorry for the mix-up. He did know about the plot, but not the details.
	Quote