DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post

**Inconykic** · 02-10-2006, 04:13 PM

not to nitpick you, but Antonio Villaragosa was not the mayor at the time this was supposed to have occured. So it is not surprising that he was not told.

I agree, it is obvious why it was brought up again, at this particular time and considering the purposes of the Administration, it is also reasonable that it was not deemed important to let the mayor know about something that happened 3 or 4 years ago. ( It might even have allowed the opposition to put their spin on it before Bush could do so)

02-10-2006, 04:13 PM	#15
Inconykic Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 369 Senior Member	not to nitpick you, but Antonio Villaragosa was not the mayor at the time this was supposed to have occured. So it is not surprising that he was not told. I agree, it is obvious why it was brought up again, at this particular time and considering the purposes of the Administration, it is also reasonable that it was not deemed important to let the mayor know about something that happened 3 or 4 years ago. ( It might even have allowed the opposition to put their spin on it before Bush could do so)
	Quote