DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post

**BPitt** · 01-23-2012, 07:54 PM

"The cost of fighting back against a questionable charge could be the death of many sites."

Exactly my point - that is the (intended) 'chiller effect'. BIG government does not want 'free speech' ; well, not too much free speech anyway. LOL

And small government does? The initial proponents of this legistation were as much conservatives (such as Rubio who sponsored the bill), as they were liberals and moderates. In other words anyone with an affiliation for the Chamber of Commerce or, old media, and big business lobby groups

01-23-2012, 07:54 PM	#13
BPitt Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 518 Senior Member	"The cost of fighting back against a questionable charge could be the death of many sites." Exactly my point - that is the (intended) 'chiller effect'. BIG government does not want 'free speech' ; well, not too much free speech anyway. LOL And small government does? The initial proponents of this legistation were as much conservatives (such as Rubio who sponsored the bill), as they were liberals and moderates. In other words anyone with an affiliation for the Chamber of Commerce or, old media, and big business lobby groups
	Quote