DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post

**Badyalectlawl** · 09-15-2011, 07:53 PM

How are they directly equating the cost to job loss?

They are doing free association again. "Well higher cost means less jobs"

By that same token, the tax "break" for the top % also cost jobs... $700B over 10 years would be 950K jobs by this stunted reasoning.

09-15-2011, 07:53 PM	#2
Badyalectlawl Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 449 Senior Member	How are they directly equating the cost to job loss? They are doing free association again. "Well higher cost means less jobs" By that same token, the tax "break" for the top % also cost jobs... $700B over 10 years would be 950K jobs by this stunted reasoning.
	Quote