DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post

**GroosteFoessy** · 05-05-2010, 05:46 PM

Zippy, you're right, it IS absurd.

I wasn't agreeing with you. The absurdity of some airport security procedures is not "owning you." Much of it is to fulfill job descriptions.

The suspect that got on the plane may have been "owned."

The screw-ups that had occured along the way are what caused things to go awry

Since he was apprehended, how do you know anything went awry? Suppose he had an accomplice who was a passenger on the flight, but never boarded after the other was arrested.

05-05-2010, 05:46 PM	#9
GroosteFoessy Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 540 Senior Member	Zippy, you're right, it IS absurd. I wasn't agreeing with you. The absurdity of some airport security procedures is not "owning you." Much of it is to fulfill job descriptions. The suspect that got on the plane may have been "owned." The screw-ups that had occured along the way are what caused things to go awry Since he was apprehended, how do you know anything went awry? Suppose he had an accomplice who was a passenger on the flight, but never boarded after the other was arrested.
	Quote